Modestas Vainius wrote: > >So says the comment, and the commit message, but not the code: > > Now I see that this comment is confusing, I didn't express myself too well > here. > > The idea was to get an auto-buildable match on any (i.e. a single, but not > all) prior step as well as current step. But that does not matter any more > because this method is based on the flaw you pointed out.
Hmm, well.. *Is* matching just one, not all previous steps good enough? As written, it does always ensure that the configure step can autoselect the build system. That could be argued to be good enough, at least with the current set of build systems. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
