On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:53:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Tag: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > Severity: serious
> and ftpmaster requires an override for this tag to allow packages into > the archive. I believe Policy is currently silent on this topic. The > normative contents of that wiki page should be turned into a Policy > proposal. The webpage currently says that RPATH is allowed for packages within the same source package, which is how it should be. I wonder why lintian.d.o shows warnings for some of my packages [1], while if I manually check them there are no warnings. Is there some discrepancy between lintian in the archive and the instance running at lintian.d.o? (IOW, I'm asking if this package will be REJECTed now, which would be a bogus REJECT IMO.) [1] http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/ya...@gnu.org.html#kazehakase -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
