On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 22:11 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > I've sent a collection of patches that will be needed to support > > upcoming Audacious 2.2 upstream. > > Thanks for your work. But why has ALSA to follow Audacious? Isn't > it possible to adapt Audacious' features to the existing ALSA code?
I'm not requiring any new code. I'm using code that has already been written and documented; it's just buggy because it hasn't been used by many applications yet. I'm not asking ALSA to "follow Audacious" but merely to do what it is intended to do. > > There's been no response yet (for about a week now). It's up to > > you whether you want to add these patches in Debian or wait; > > Hmm, I prefer to find an overall solution. I am sure that users > from other distros would like to have a working Audacious 2.2, > though. I agree. Upstream fixes are better. Perhaps you know someone who has commit access to ALSA? Peace, John Lindgren -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
