On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 16:07 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > tag 552395 wontfix > thanks > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > It's useful to be able to exclude bugs tagged 'moreinfo' from bug > > triage. However, the tag then needs to be cleared when additional > > information is received, and it would be helpful for the BTS to do so > > automatically. > > There's no way for the BTS to know if the information received from > the submitter is actually the more info needed. [And sometimes, it's > not even information that the submitter can submit.]
Of course, but a maintainer at least needs to look at the report and decide that. > In theory at least, the maintainer should respond when the submitter > sends in new information telling the submitter that their new > information is what was required, and clearing the tag in the same > step. This is fine for a single maintainer, but in the case of a team- maintained package with a lot of bugs going to a mailing list there's a significant risk that they are not dealt with straight away and this is missed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
