Le lundi 12 octobre 2009 10:22:38 Francois Marier, vous avez écrit : > > The problem is that safe-rm replaces rm for all users, human and > > non-human ones, where having aliases for human users only is probably a > > good idea and could be rather easily be implemented in safe-rm. > > Ok, so how about this: have the "rm" symlink in /usr/bin be optional > (through a debconf question) > > That way if you say yes, all users (human or not) automatically get the > benefit of safe-rm (with the extra dependency on a working perl). > > If you say no, then either users should "alias rm='safe-rm'" in their local > shell rc file or the admin can do it system-wide. > > Francois
Hi Francois, I'd be satisfied with that solution, given a clear warning on the "perl- dependent" solution (and a good advice on how to set the alias system-wide). Thanks for being responsive ! OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
