Le lundi 12 octobre 2009 08:20:30, vous avez écrit : > Closing this bug report since it appears that it's not actually a bug in > safe-rm. > > Feel free to reopen with more details if you think I am mistaken. > > Cheers, > Francois
Hi François, I'd say it _is_ a bug, because the perl-based "rm" (safe-rm) is used by all system tools (if configured so). Where the original "rm" is prone to perl failures, safe-rm's rm is not and can lead (and lead me) to upgrade failure. The problem is that safe-rm replaces rm for all users, human and non-human ones, where having aliases for human users only is probably a good idea and could be rather easily be implemented in safe-rm. But then, I'm not the maintainer :-p Regards, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
