* Faidon Liambotis: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> Right. Please upload opensaml2 first (after sending in a source >> debdiff for review), and then wait with uploading shibboleth-sp2 until >> we tell you it's okay to do so.
> OK, will do. How should we handle the fact that the newer xmltooling is > breaking the "old" (as in, lenny) opensaml2/shibboleth-sp2? We could theoretically add a Conflicts: to a new upload of xmltooling, but this is unnecessary. We don't do this for every bug that stems from the interaction of two packages. > I don't think it can be solved with regular dpkg constructs (xmltooling > is already present in security), would just mentioning it in the DSA be > alright? "apt-get upgrade" will do the right thing, so it's sufficient to mention the issue in general, I think. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
