Florian Weimer wrote: > Right. Please upload opensaml2 first (after sending in a source > debdiff for review), and then wait with uploading shibboleth-sp2 until > we tell you it's okay to do so. OK, will do. How should we handle the fact that the newer xmltooling is breaking the "old" (as in, lenny) opensaml2/shibboleth-sp2?
I don't think it can be solved with regular dpkg constructs (xmltooling is already present in security), would just mentioning it in the DSA be alright? > AFAICT, opensaml2 hasn't been uploaded to stable-proposed-updates yet, > so no action appears to be required from the release team. Yes, that's my impression as well, hence I'm closing #548126 (pu) with this mail. Thanks, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
