Julian Gilbey <j...@polya.uklinux.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:04:06AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> Perhaps even the magic Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination?
[...]
>> I looked at the changelog - no mention of this change. I only
>> figured out what was happening when I stumbled onto this bug report.
Perhaps it wasn't clear enough, but here's what I said in the changelog:
* Change emacsVER to be the GTK+ version to match the upstream
default, and add an emacsVER-lucid package for those who still
want the non-GTK+ version. Thanks to Romain Francoise
<rfranco...@debian.org> and others for the report.
(closes: #539800)
> I second this comment. The other possibility is to provide a dummy
> transitional emacs23-gtk package, but the current situation of the
> package just vanishing does not work.
I added the Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination recently. Is that
not sufficient as far as you're concerned?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
