On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:29:26AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Last night I was having a second thought on this. While the halt > > command is useful, I think being able to raise "errors" to "halts" > > is also very useful; halt would help me for .sh stuff, but I'd like > > stuff to halt on any method, where afaict I can't use halt freely. > I'm not sure I understand what you really want to achieve, but I guess > it will get clear as soon as you have submitted your patch, right? :)
It's been a while and I'm not sure if what I wanted to do is the following: Add a config option or something that makes any errors act like halts. This way, if you're using a standard backupninja method which defines an error when something goes wrong, the backup process would halt entirely instead of dropping out to the next script in backup.d. As for the patch, I'll have to dig my harddrive at office, because I don't know where it might be, but I think this was quite trivial to add. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
