Jordi Mallach wrote (06 Jun 2009 14:07:06 GMT) : > Last night I was having a second thought on this. While the halt > command is useful, I think being able to raise "errors" to "halts" > is also very useful; halt would help me for .sh stuff, but I'd like > stuff to halt on any method, where afaict I can't use halt freely.
> So I guess this bug is still a concern for me. I'll try to submit the > patch I had been working on next monday, as it's in my git clone at work. I'm not sure I understand what you really want to achieve, but I guess it will get clear as soon as you have submitted your patch, right? :) Bye, -- intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc | Who wants a world in which the guarantee that we shall not | die of starvation would entail the risk of dying of boredom ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
