Eugene V. Lyubimkin <jackyf.de...@gmail.com> (20/08/2009): > Hi Cyril,
Hello, > You want 'cupt satisfy liblo-dev' instead of install in this > case. The 'install' subcommand isn't supposed to process virtual > dependencies, only real binary packages. oh, tricky. :( > > | k...@kbsd:~/hack/sooperlooper-1.0.8c$ sudo cupt -o debug::resolver=1 > > build-dep sooperlooper > > | Building the package cache... [done] > > | Initializing package resolver and worker... [done] > > | Scheduling requested actions... D: strictly satisfying relation 'cdbs' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'debhelper (>= 4.0.0)' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libasound2-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libjack0.100.0-dev | libjack-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'liblo-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libncurses5-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libsamplerate-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libsigc++-1.2-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libsndfile1-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libwxgtk2.6-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'libxml2-dev' > > | D: strictly satisfying relation 'build-essential' > > | [done] > > | Resolving possible unmet dependencies... D: started resolving > > | D: (0:0.0) problem: package '<satisfy>': unsatisfied depends > > 'libasound2-dev' > This has to do nothing with liblo-dev... I should point that “debuild -b” was mentioning liblo-dev was the only remainining B-D that was missing, that's why I thought it might be. (Although I concur that the result of this command seemed to point a different issue, of course.) > However, given the current showsrc of sooperlooper, this relation > should not be processed on your kfreebsd-* arches and this is > probably a bug. Can you please show output of 'cupt config-dump > apt::architecture' on this machine? “kfreebsd-i386”. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
