On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:26:51AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > I can certainly help maintain that, for as much time as I can actually > spend on dovecot-antispam -- I can't see much problems being debian > specific unless you start patching it heavily :)
I don't envisage patching it at this stage, it's doing everything I need from it nicely enough. But if that should happen, I'll most likely push patches to you for inclusion rather than forking it for debian anyhow. Mainly it'll just be if things change out from underneath it that break something, or bugs that people find. > FWIW, if somebody _does_ report some to be horribly broken I'm always > interested, even though I may not always be able to do something about > it right away. Yep. That's pretty much the best we can guarantee them :) > As far as just crm114 is concerned, I have no intention of stopping > using it, it's been working great for me ever since I started using > crm114 almost two years ago, and I use the antispam plugin daily for my > email. > > However, I wouldn't recommend enabling the signature-log backend, it's > not really working right, at the very least not using transactions > properly. There are still people using it, but I'm not in favour. Noted. I'll skip that one until/unless someone wants to get their hands dirty with it. I'm not aware of anyone asking for yet. Thanks! Ron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
