Hi Johannes, I'm happy to add support for more backends to this, I just can't test the ones I don't use myself. Since I'm pretty sure you'll be able to fix anything that breaks for you, that's enough of a green light for me to add at least -crm114, but I'll probably do them all at the same time, then assess which ones to keep based on who can help maintain them in a working condition and whether someone reports them as being horribly broken.
Cheers, Ron On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:16:36PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Package: dovecot-antispam > Severity: wishlist > > I'd really like to use the debian packaging myself on > my production servers, instead of rolling my own, since > even though I do maintain the plugin, I don't really > change it much on my servers -- I need something I've > only just committed much less often than a new dovecot > version is released :) > > It would be nice to have dovecot-antispam-* packages > (with dovecot-antispam being an empty package just > depending on dovecot-antispam-mailtrain I guess), but > I'd settle for just a -crm114 version. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc5-wl-30113-gf1aa58f-dirty (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
