gark...@mailueberfall.de wrote: >> That won't really make a big difference, we won't fix it faster I'm >> afraid. >> >> I'd happily debug it if I had two monitors and a capable video card :-) >> >> If you can cook a patch or find the problem, I'll try to include it in our >> package. >> >> Cheers, >> Emilio >> > > > Well, not in the sense of speed. I was rather thinking of other people > accidentially destroying their (working) environment. But now that it is in > testing, it may probably too late... > > I'm neither an X or gnome guru, so I fear I cannot really help at finding > the bug, but I found a bugzilla entry at gnome.org which states the bug > being already fixed. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579387 > -> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580103 > > At the end it says it was fixed in git (but not exactly where) and the later > comments suggest that the fix in git may have reworked a bit. > > I hope you're more familiar with their git repo to find the patch.
The fix is this: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/glib/commit/?id=d3d81f74c5c227fb17494c0388ede1e83557a7e1 Before I look at backporting the change to 2.20, can you confirm that 2.21.4 from experimental is fine? The fix was first released in 2.21.2. Cheers, Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature