On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 12:46:13PM -0500, gzeus wrote: Hi!
> Hmm. Yeah, that's inconvenient -_-, and the wording of the error, > while perfectly fine for 90% of people doesn't make sense to people > like myself who live in shells and startx from there. Then again, Then, simply logging in on another VT gives you the new PAM limits. I understand that the text doesn't match your case. > The other thing is that answering that debconf question 'YES' doesn't > alter /etc/security/limits.conf. True, I've decided to place a file in /etc/security/limits.d/ instead of messing with limits.conf. (multiple configuration files instead of a single large one, same with modprobe.d, amavis and so on) I just noticed that the debconf template is ambiguous. Will change that. Thanks for pointing out this problem. Cheerio -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
