On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, CaT wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > severity 317598 normal > > thanks > > > > I reiterate that I can't take this report seriously unless you tell me > > a way to reproduce it. In particular, you didn't tell me about your > > Have we spoken about this previously? I had a look at the archived bugs > for procmail incase I reported this before but I can't find anything. > Either via the list of archived bugs for procmail or via searching for > my email address.
Sorry if I was not being clear. I was referring to the message I sent you yesterday about this. If you missed it, the discussion is archived here: http://bugs.debian.org/317598 > > procmail.log file at all. > > What do you need to know? I still have it but as it's big (190mb) I > don't wish to mail it out (plus it contains private info :). Well, I obviously am not interested in a 190mb big file. What I would like is that you look at it first. It should tell you where exactly your messages were delivered. procmail sometimes does an heroic effort to deliver the mails *somewhere* in case of a full /var/mail so it is still possible that the mail is not lost and it's just in another "unexpected" folder. This is why the procmail.log file is so important. Regarding the size, a simple way to make it smaller is to rotate it by day, for example: LOGFILE=$HOME/tmp/procmail-`date +%Y%m%d`.log -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
