On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Russell Stuart wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 17:39 +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > From X, conspy 2 and 5 work as expected. > > So, apart from the inexplicable vanishing act of /dev/vcsa1, everything > works as expected - yes?
Right. > Well, apart making the error message clearer. Yes. > The problem is the vcs device nodes were renamed at some stage, and > conspy tries both. > > I will leave this as a bug to fix the error message. Ok. But how do we go about the "the inexplicably vanished /dev/vcsa1"? Kernel and/or udev bug? Cheers, -- Cristian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org