On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Russell Stuart wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 17:39 +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > From X, conspy 2 and 5 work as expected.
>
> So, apart from the inexplicable vanishing act of /dev/vcsa1, everything
> works as expected - yes?

Right.

> Well, apart making the error message clearer.

Yes.

> The problem is the vcs device nodes were renamed at some stage, and
> conspy tries both.
>
> I will leave this as a bug to fix the error message.

Ok.  But how do we go about the "the inexplicably vanished /dev/vcsa1"?
Kernel and/or udev bug?


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to