On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 17:39 +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > From X, conspy 2 and 5 work as expected.
So, apart from the inexplicable vanishing act of /dev/vcsa1, everything works as expected - yes? Well, apart making the error message clearer. The problem is the vcs device nodes were renamed at some stage, and conspy tries both. I will leave this as a bug to fix the error message. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
