On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:59:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René,
> Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > - No OOo package seems to have a direct dependency against OpenSSL. > > > > What do I miss here? > > That the build of the webdav ucp does a explicit -lssl. And that no > OOo package depends directly on libssl0.9.8 is untrue, see > http://packages.debian.org/openoffice.org-core: > > [...] > dep: libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8f-5) [not amd64, i386] > SSL shared libraries > [...] ah, I only checked all packages on amd64, not expecting different dependencies on different architectures. > No idea why it does not result in a dependency on amd64/i386, but... On architectures other than i386/amd64 the build log says: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcrypto.so.0.9.8 could be avoided if "debian/openoffice.org-core/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libucpdav1.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libssl.so.0.9.8 could be avoided if "debian/openoffice.org-core/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libucpdav1.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). On i386/amd64 the build log says: Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libucpdav1.so i486-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-z,noexecstack -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed ... I don't know why the -Wl,--as-needed is only passed on i386/amd64, but it seems in no case OpenSSL is used directly by OOo. > Grüße/Regards, > > René cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
