tag 534243 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> openoffice.org-core uses libneon27, which is linked with OpenSSL.
>
> Looking at the licences this seems to be OK.
Right.
> But other (GPL'ed) applications mistakenly linked with libneon27
> instead of libneon27-gnutls are a source of GPL violations.
But OOo is not GPL.
> Getting libneon27 phased out would therefore be a good thing, and
> having openoffice.org-core as one of only two remaining users moved
> would be one step of decreasing it's usage.
>
> It would also avoid some surprising effects of LGPL+OpenSSL in
> Openoffice.org (impossibility of the plain LGPL->GPL conversion).
But it would introduce the interesting situation that OOo would link
against libneon28-gnutls *AND* link against openssl directly
-> nonsense.
If you would have looked at OOos changelog, you would have seen that using
the OpenSSL version was deliberate:
openoffice.org (1:2.4.0~ooh680m5-1) experimental; urgency=high
[...]
* debian/rules:
- build against OpenSSL versions of curl and (especially) neon again
as the webdav ucp now directly links against openssl...
(reopens: #391671). Use system-openssl.
*sigh*. One more avoidable + wontfix "bug". :(
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
