On lun, 2009-04-27 at 02:03 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> > >> I'm leaving the bug open until we decide wether it makes sense or not to > >> add hal to thunar-volman recommends/dependencies. > > > > Looking at the thunar-volman code, I think it should definitely add a > dependency > on hal, as it will be basically useless without.
Sure, but isn't thunar-volman useless without thunar anyway (thunar already recommends the hal daemon)? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
