-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> I do not say that CDBS is correct or not in its current behaviour, >> just that it has a well defined vurrent behaviour that users rely on >> (whether or not they are aware of it). >> >> I have tagged this as wontfix for that reason. Please note that even >> if this means I do not expect this to change (or at least not soon - >> it is possible to change when we decide to bump ABI at some point, if >> ever), I am still interested in discussing it! > >Why not use an environment variable then?
Like you quoted right above: Because CDBS is in active use with current behaviour. Does that somehow not make sense? >> Could you perhaps provide some good examples of upstream software >> needing custom CFLAGS that is cumbersome to work around using CDBS? > >Yeah, Linux modules. Or plugins in general for all sort of programs. >They're usually very picky when it comes to CFLAGS. I understand that they are picky about CFLAGS, but can't their CFLAGS be re-applied when using CDBS? Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkng+FUACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiIDwCfbTGYoajFXHD9f/+enBMydqhE wFwAnjJOzYD2F17de3tJXRpjNZzbwzUJ =WCF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
