* Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> [2009-03-30 16:28:55 CEST]: > Gerfried Fuchs schrieb: > > Looked into it again - it only seems to affect boost1.37 badly. The > > version it was reported for boost1.35 is only in experimental, and the > > version it was reported for boost is already in testing. > > hmm, so there is already a fixed version for boost in unstable?
My message was rather refering to the fact that boost1.37 is the only one that's not in sync between testing and unstable. :) But yes, the fixed version for boost1.37 is in unstable, see the done version in #520749, and the other two clones of the bug report also have their done version set already. > sounds ok. so which versions do have the fix now? Just want to add the > conflicts > with earlier versions. From reading the bug logs: boost (>= 1.3.14.1-16), boost1.35 (>= 1.35.0-10), boost1.37 (>= 1.37.0-8) But given that you rather say conflicts I guess you are looking for this: boost (<< 1.3.14.1-16), boost1.35 (<< 1.35.0-10), boost1.37 (<< 1.37.0-8) Hope that helps. :) Rhonda [not a boost maintainer, so take it with a grain of sand] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
