Gerfried Fuchs schrieb: > * Gerfried Fuchs <rho...@deb.at> [2009-03-27 10:59:29 CET]: >> * Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> [2009-03-23 20:57:49 CET]: >>> The script is used to create undecorated symlinks to libraries built >>> with the "default" python version. Right now the package builds >>> libraries for Python 2.4 and Python 2.5. I don't have libraries for >>> any other python version. One way I can handle "any python version" >>> is to simply not provide symlinks if Boost.Python doesn't have >>> libararies for the default version of python doesn't have. >>> >>> Once Python 2.6 is in sid, I'll update boost to build libraries for >>> it. >> ... so for the time being the boost (and all its dependencies) are >> blocked from transitioning to squeeze because of these bug reports. Is >> that really the intended behavior, how long is it expected to take to >> get solved for the good? > > Looked into it again - it only seems to affect boost1.37 badly. The > version it was reported for boost1.35 is only in experimental, and the > version it was reported for boost is already in testing.
hmm, so there is already a fixed version for boost in unstable? > My suggestion is to reduce the severity for the bugreport against > boost1.37 for the time being so that it can transition to testing and > won't hold up other packages along that way until a proper solution has > been worked out. > > Would that be acceptable to you, Matthias? sounds ok. so which versions do have the fix now? Just want to add the conflicts with earlier versions. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
