> > I just plan not to add the new file to the source tree. The > > existing files which are part of the original distribution can > > stay. > As far as I understood the submitter, that file is not new, but > would be an replacement.
That does not make a difference to me. I don't plan to add this it to the source tree or update the existing file. That's part of the sources that I take from the web2c maintainer. If you can convince *him* to make the update, fine. Else, you have to distribute that file separately. But, I am wondering what you would gain by distributing emacs lisp files as part of some source package? That source package does not copy this file into a runtime path, so users will not be able to make any use of it (at least not without further action). That's why I think that it makes much more sense that debian distributes these files separately. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
