On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:59:37PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Hello Steve, > > There's a minor bug against emacs-goodies-el for perldoc.el. Would you > like to fix it upstream or should I patch for Debian? > > http://bugs.debian.org/314869 > > I suppose patching for Debian makes sense since anyone installing perldoc.el > for themselves will have perldoc also installed. Althought you could > image, years later, perldoc getting removed without the user realising > it... Anyway, your call. Except for the extra `t' argument...
Upstream is essentially dead for this code. OK, looking over it would something as simple as using nil there work? I admit I'm hazy on lisp nowadays, but I must point out that this code isn't mine - I guess you added it looking at the header... so it's your bug! Failing that it might be better to use shell-command-to-string? or start-process-shell-command? Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
