Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:59:37PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Hello Steve, > > > > There's a minor bug against emacs-goodies-el for perldoc.el. Would you > > like to fix it upstream or should I patch for Debian? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/314869 > > > > I suppose patching for Debian makes sense since anyone installing perldoc.el > > for themselves will have perldoc also installed. Althought you could > > image, years later, perldoc getting removed without the user realising > > it... Anyway, your call. Except for the extra `t' argument... > > Upstream is essentially dead for this code. > > OK, looking over it would something as simple as using nil there work? > > I admit I'm hazy on lisp nowadays, but I must point out that this code > isn't mine - I guess you added it looking at the header... so it's your > bug! > > Failing that it might be better to use shell-command-to-string? or > start-process-shell-command?
Sorry Steve, I was looking at the original file in my CVS tree, but in fact you're right I did substantially modify the file using dpatch, and I hadn't noticed. How embarassing. Don't worry about it. I'll deal with it! Sorry again, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
