On 2009-02-22 (Sunday) at 16:38:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:39:27PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > What could be done, is removing --guess-section from --guess-all and > maybe document that --guess-section is likely to show false positives. > Then --guess-dev would need to imply --libdevel since --guess-section is > the reason why --guess-all without using --libdevel finds development > libraries although they are not in section libs. This could also be > a way to deprecate --libdevel and get rid of this option in the > longterm. I need to think about this.
That sounds good to me. I was actually using --guess-all when this happened, but afterwards discovered that it was --guess-section which was causing libpam-unix2 to be listed. Cheers, Mark. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
