On 2008-12-28 04:35 +0100, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> writes: > >> On 2008-11-24 04:32 +0100, lee wrote: >> >>> Trying to open the url http://www.google.com displays a blank page and/or >>> the message: "error in process sentinel: Arithmetic range error: "round", >>> -1.0e+INF". >> >> Me too, Lisp backtrace is attached. Note that Google redirects users in >> Germany to http://www.google.de/, this may or may not be relevant. > > Do you guys use w3-el on a regular basis? Is it an important > part of Emacs for you?
Not anymore for me. In fact, I switched to w3m-el a few years ago because w3-el did not work with Emacs > 21, and I have to say that w3m-el is much more usable since it runs the browser asynchronously and does not block Emacs for such annoyingly long time. > I am thinking about asking these packages to be removed from > Debian, because they have been essentially abandoned upstream. > There seems to be a little activity, but not much: the > development mailing list has had only two messages on it, both > from the same person, in the last 6 months, and the Git > repository has had no commits in the same time frame. > > Alternatively, I could offer them up for adoption. I think removing would be best unless there is more upstream activity and a new upstream release. The fact that there's no released version that works with Emacs 22 is telling. > Very few people have these packages installed (only 283, which is > 0.38% of submitters, according to popcon: > http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=w3-el-e21) That includes me, but I wouldn't miss really miss the package. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
