Hi! This bug has been closed "per Werner's very plausible explanation". Nowhere in the email is a link to where I can find the relevant discussion. I tried browsing bugtraq, but came up empty. Where should I look to find the answer?

Thanks!

David Richfield

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#311286: davfs2: WebDAV URL's with spaces do not work,
which was filed against the davfs2 package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 311286-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 09:44:32 +0000
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 02:44:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DiqvI-0007IP-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 02:44:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
        by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 5719B8DC45C
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:44:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cirrus.madduck.net (cirrus.madduck.net [192.168.14.1])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
        by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1CA8CC256
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:44:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cirrus.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 1B10820438D; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:44:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:44:27 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.11-cirrus i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD,
        X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Closing this bug per Werner's plausible explanation. Thanks!

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"if you are going to run a rinky-dink distro made by a couple of
 volunteers, why not run a rinky-dink distro made by a lot of
 volunteers?"
                                                    -- jaldhar h. vyas

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCsUn7IgvIgzMMSnURAqEOAKCLvvgB8LXAp7ytiUyQyNVfUA0qGQCeLrSP
SvqubMCjRTZkfolPVMHixt8=
=mOgX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--


--
David Richfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+27 82 921 1817


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to