On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:22:04PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > Peter De Wachter, thank you for the patch. > > Nicolas François, when you have a chance, please review the patch above.
Sorry, I missed your mail. Yes. Using mbrtowc instead of mbtowc is an improvement. It will not break the intend of the patches 65-dfa-optional.patch and 64-egf-speedup.patch (speedup in non C locales). The testsuite did not show any new issues. Best Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
