* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-29 18:29-0500]:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:12:23PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > I'm trying to suss out why you originally set the puppet package to do a
> > dh_installinit for the puppet daemon to specifically start at 21:
> > 
> > dh_installinit -ppuppet --error-handler=true -- defaults 21 
> > 
> > I'm sure there is a good reason, I'm just not able to figure it out.
> 
> It's possible that I didn't write that line -- a lot of the early packaging
> work was done by Jamie Wilkinson, and the only stuff I changed was stuff
> that needed to be changed for some reason.

Makes sense.

> Looking at what's started at 20 on my local system, I can't see anything
> that Puppet explicitly depends on, so if it's causing anyone any hassle
> where it is, I'd say pull it and start it at 20.

I actually think that the original bug submitter is wanting it started
*later*, not earlier. However, I am not seeing how this is something
that is related to sysv-init and should be handled in a way outside of
this system. Especially since networking should be up by runlevel 2 S20
(unless someone has some asynchronous networking situation such as
network manager, dhcp or something else going on...)

> Bring on dependency-based init systems!

Yeah! we've got the lsb headers...

micah

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to