Better yet, provide a help document declaring the missing styles and
classes that aren't available under Debian; and then reference how to
install them locally to add those classes that don't comply with
Debian's strict licensing policy. That way it allows folks unfamiliar
with /usr/local/share/texmf/ how that works with the Debian mktexlsr
approach to updating local and global classes.
- Marc
Marc J. Driftmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.reanimality.com
(509)435-5212
On Nov 27, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:29:16PM +0000, Pedro Antonio Neves wrote:
Hi,
I readded the bugtracker, hope that's fine with you.
I think it's not a matter of installing packages (or I don't know
what
packages should be installed).
However I found this bug report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/3080
that
give some information about this.
Well in a case where the needed style/class stuff is not packaged in
the Debian texlive packages or is not even part of texlive for e.g.
licensing reasons it can't work out. Ok we could remove those examples
from the LyX package to 'resolve' the problem.
If you change the class of the document the output will look different
because it won't use the aa styles but the one called for article.
I can see that if I make the suggested changes on the lyx templates
files, things work out fine. Nevertheless, maybe the developers
should
fix it at the origin?
As you can read in the bugreport JMarc explained that there is no
fixed
set of 'latex' available everywhere. If you need a special class/
style file
that's not included in Debian you can always add it to your local
system or
use a different document class.
HTH,
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
