At Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:07:39 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > I was mostly VAC while the discussion was going on, and I think I > > missed the discussion. Andreas, do you have a good patch that I can > > apply, or do I need to think through to get my way around it ? > > No I do actually not have a *good* patch. > > > The following patch I digged up from the past logs should probably be > > revised ? > > Well it is no solution but rather a workaround. Today I would use > libstdc++6-4.3-dev (and I actually use this workaround in copies of > your tools in the debian directory of my packages). I have no idea > how to reliably obtain the version libstdc++6 and thus I would try > to discuss the issue on debian-devel.
Yeah, I think this change looks good enough, but I guess it should also be okay to point to libstdc++-dev. Thoughts? > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > --- /usr/bin/d-devlibdeps 2008-02-28 00:32:40.000000000 +0100 > > +++ d-devlibdeps 2008-04-18 18:55:15.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ > > -e 's/libatk-1.0-0-dev/libatk1.0-dev/' \ > > -e 's/libxml2-2-dev/libxml2-dev/' \ > > -e 's/libgthread-2.0-0-dev/libglib2.0-dev/' \ > > - -e 's/libstdc++6-dev/libstdc++6-4.1-dev/' \ > > + -e 's/libstdc++6-dev/libstdc++6-4.2-dev/' \ > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/#/-e}" \ > > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
