On Thursday 30 October 2008 23:07, Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Thursday 30 October 2008 22:20, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Jan Wagner wrote: > >>> could you please try to test the example-cfg2.txt without the > >>> $$dnsbltext config statement with the debian package(1.10pre7)? > >>> Removing should solve the issue. If that fixes the issue, I will create > >>> a new package and ask for inclution into lenny, if we are fast enough. > >> > >> Using the ones provided worked OK. > > > > just to clarify, the example-cfg2.txt without "$$dnsbltext" works with > > 1.10pre7 for you? > > > > Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. > > -- > > Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned! > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > Version: 3.1 > > GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE > > Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++ > > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > If nothing is changed and/or you use the example provided in the package, > it works fine, there is a problem when you try to use the newer config > file.
There are 2 examples ... I guess you are talking about postfwd.cf.gz. You initial bug report was about using the example-cfg2.txt.gz with debian package(1.10pre7). Please can you test the example-cfg2.txt.gz with the removed "$$dnsbltext" entry, this should be the only incompatibility against 1.10pre7. sid:/usr/share/doc/postfwd/examples# ls -la *.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2013 Jul 15 22:47 example-cfg2.txt.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1542 May 5 09:20 postfwd.cf.gz Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
pgpa249ACNThx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
