On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi Justin,
On Sunday 26 October 2008 23:29, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Package: postfwd
Version: 1.10pre7c-2
In one of the config or readme files it says to use the latest up-to-date
rules on the website; however, when these are used:
maybe you refer to the following out
of /usr/share/doc/postfwd/examples/example-cfg2.txt.gz:
# downloaded from http://hege.li/howto/spam/etc/postfwd/postfwd.conf
# check for more recent versions!
README.Debian:
Please provide a config file, usualy /etc/postfix/postfwd.cf. Examples are
located in /usr/share/doc/postfwd/examples/.
An other can be found at http://hege.li/howto/spam/etc/postfwd/postfwd.conf
and is provided as example-cfg2.txt.
There should be a warning, it will not work the Debian package (1.10pre7):
In the config file:
### Example config for postfwd 1.10pre8+
Once I pulled the latest (1.10pre8+) this problem went away.
Okay .. lets summary ... you used the config from
http://hege.li/howto/spam/etc/postfwd/postfwd.conf, which states it is for
1.10pre8 and above with postfwd 1.10pre7c.
What about using /usr/share/doc/postfwd/examples/postfwd.cf.gz, does this work
with the postfwd 1.10pre7c?
Trying that now.
# zcat /usr/share/doc/postfwd/examples/postfwd.cf.gz > /etc/postfwd/postfwd.cf
With the standard Debian Testing package and config (1.10pre7c-2).
No errors yet but no rejects yet either, waiting...
It appears to work correctly.
Oct 27 07:39:43 p34 postfix/smtpd[5787]: warning: 88.250.162.237: hostname
dsl88-250-41709.ttnet.net.tr verification failed: Name or service not known
Oct 27 07:39:43 p34 postfix/smtpd[5787]: connect from unknown[88.250.162.237]
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfwd[2276]: [DNSBL] object 88.250.162.237 listed on rbl:bl.spamcop.net (answer: 127.0.0.2, time: 0s)
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfwd[2276]: [DNSBL] object 88.250.162.237 listed on rbl:zen.spamhaus.org (answer: 127.0.0.11, time: 0s)
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfwd[2276]: [RULES] rule=6, id=RBL_001, client=unknown[88.250.162.237], sender=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, recipient=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, helo=<pc-1>, proto=SMTP, state=RCPT, defining HIT_rhls=0
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfwd[2276]: [RULES] rule=6, id=RBL_001, client=unknown[88.250.162.237], sender=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, recipient=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, helo=<pc-1>, proto=SMTP, state=RCPT, defining HIT_rbls=2
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfwd[2276]: [RULES] rule=9, id=RBL_004, client=unknown[88.250.162.237], sender=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, recipient=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, helo=<pc-1>, proto=SMTP, state=RCPT, delay=0s, hits=RBL_001;RBL_004, action=554 5.7.1 blocked using 2 RBLs
Oct 27 07:39:44 p34 postfix/smtpd[5787]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[88.250.162.237]: 454 4.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: blocked using 2 RBLs; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=<pc-1>
Oct 27 07:39:45 p34 postfix/smtpd[5787]: disconnect from unknown[88.250.162.237]
Justin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
