On Sat Oct 25 08:25, Sven Joachim wrote: > The relevant message in that file seems to be this one: > > > In toplevel form: > > silly-mail.el:86:1:Error: /usr/bin/mail is not executable > > That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a Debian-specific > patch that lets sendmail.el throw an error if neither sendmail nor > /usr/bin/mail can be found, first reported and discussed in #429059. > Since a sensible solution had already been proposed in #429059, I'm > inclined to throw all these bugs together and assign them to the emacs22 > package. > > Opinions? > Sounds good. Given there's a solution we should try and get it uploaded quickly. Explicitly adding Rob to the CC to get input.
I'm happy to upload an NMU, do the whole NMU or leave it to Rob, but doing one of those three soon would be good (-: Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
