On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:15:03PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > On 01-Oct-2008, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > [the experimental Python packages in the sandbox] seems to assume > > I'm running docutils directly from an upstream checkout. It looks > > like the sandbox stuff in the python-docutils .deb. > > I have the ‘python-docutils’ package installed, and it doesn't > include the ‘sandbox’ stuff. Where are you seeing it?
Sorry, I think there's a "is not" missing there. > > Perhaps it would be useful for these contrib scripts and modules > > to be available directly to Debian users, so they (I) can just run > > "rst2pdf", because it's in /usr/bin and the necessary contrib > > modules are installed in the appropriate place. > > The sandbox appears to be (as implied by the name) an experimental > area for disparate additions to Docutils. I don't think they'd be a > good fit all packaged together in one. > > An alternative approach would be to package discrete items from the > sandbox as separate Debian packages. For example, Bug#500753, which > is my ITP for ‘docutils-writer-manpage’. That would indeed be a better approach; I was assuming that nobody wanted to go to that much trouble. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
