On 01-Oct-2008, Trent W. Buck wrote: > [the experimental Python packages in the sandbox] seems to assume > I'm running docutils directly from an upstream checkout. It looks > like the sandbox stuff in the python-docutils .deb.
I have the ‘python-docutils’ package installed, and it doesn't include the ‘sandbox’ stuff. Where are you seeing it? > Perhaps it would be useful for these contrib scripts and modules to > be available directly to Debian users, so they (I) can just run > "rst2pdf", because it's in /usr/bin and the necessary contrib > modules are installed in the appropriate place. The sandbox appears to be (as implied by the name) an experimental area for disparate additions to Docutils. I don't think they'd be a good fit all packaged together in one. An alternative approach would be to package discrete items from the sandbox as separate Debian packages. For example, Bug#500753, which is my ITP for ‘docutils-writer-manpage’. -- \ “Are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, Brain, but | `\ I don't think Kay Ballard's in the union.” —_Pinky and The | _o__) Brain_ | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
