Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Well, Xfce is made to be modular, so that's the same kind of goal. In > LXDE case they took some softs from various projects, ripped some code > from various others, then assemble that in a somewhat desktop > environment. I still assume that Xfce would have profited of their > knwoledge and time and could have been improved, instead of only taking > the code they need. > Which is not an official Xfce project even if hosted on xfce.org :) The > archiver for Xfce is squeeze, which is based on xarchiver but uses Xfce > libs. (yet another time/power loss, I guess)
Good. I didn't know the goal is the same. I hope we can open up an opportunity to make lxde developers meet xfce developers. I will mention these to lxde developers when I meet them in local user group meetings. > They are already aware that it embedds an exo copy and a kind of fork > from thunar. I'll just add an update that exo is not a copy but a fork. Cool. Thanks a lot. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
