On ven, 2008-09-26 at 11:15 +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: > I think I was wrong. :( > > The copy of exo included in pcmanfm seems not as same as the original. > It has been modified and integrated with code from other projects by > pcmanfm upstream.
Hmhm yeah, having an embedded fork is not the same. > > I don't see this is a good idea to replace it by a package maintainer. > > I'd love to built pcmanfm with libexo if we can push both upstreams to > co-work together with the same exo in the future. Well, yes, but LXDE didn't really work together with Xfce, as far as I can tell. They ripped the code they need without wanting to improve Xfce, so I'm not sure how much they are willing to cooperate. On Xfce side, I guess it'll depend on the changes. > > Hope you don't mind I am closing this bug for now. I think it'd be nice to warn debian-security though. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part