On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 20:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tuesday 5 August 2008 20:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I believe when removing the comment > > has been suggested in the past, people requested that it remain in order > > to make it obvious that the mail was sent automagically and not > > "manually" by a user who just hadn't bothered to add any comments. > > A command without comments remains a command without comments, whether sent > with KMail or bts, right? Thanks for considering.
Indeed; hence the "I agree User-Agent is more appropriate" following that paragraph. :-) I'm just trying to think if there's a means of indicating that tagpending was involved without then having the current comment in that case grumbled about (the best idea I've come up with so far is an undocumented "bts --tagpending" switch, but that's not exactly ideal). Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
