David Headland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> Interesting, so it sounds like this is limited to a subset of ScanJet 5300 > units - possibly ones of a particular date range? I've just had a look at my As it happens, there are several revisions of the ASIC on which the 5300 is based, and they all behave slightly differently... (from what Rene told me when the problem was first reported and if memory serves me well - it should) JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
