On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I think the best solution at this point is to build a
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare
> a kernel-image along with it, therefore requiring no changes to
> kernel-source-2.4.27. What do you think?
>
> Release Team: If I get these 2 builds into sid can we move these into
> sarge with the other kernel updates?
I've uploaded kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) and
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-10) to sid with only the changes
described below - please approve both for sarge.
kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* remove-syscall-slot.patch: Revert the fix for CAN-2005-0137. This was
added into kernel-source-2.4.27 (2.4.27-10). Version the build-depend to
match.
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-10) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild against kernel-tree-2.4.27-10 and
kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4)
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
