On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:33:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I think the best solution at this point is to build a > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare > > a kernel-image along with it, therefore requiring no changes to > > kernel-source-2.4.27. What do you think? > > > > Release Team: If I get these 2 builds into sid can we move these into > > sarge with the other kernel updates? > > I've uploaded kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) and > kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-10) to sid with only the changes > described below - please approve both for sarge. > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * remove-syscall-slot.patch: Revert the fix for CAN-2005-0137. This was > added into kernel-source-2.4.27 (2.4.27-10). Version the build-depend to > match. > kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-10) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Rebuild against kernel-tree-2.4.27-10 and > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4)
Hi Dann, If you want to merge those changes into kernel-source-2.4.27 (obviously for a future, non-sarge r0 release) please feel free to do so. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
