Quoting Luca Capello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The template file has been corrected [1], for the other files there are > three small problems (but read below): > > - fr.po: line 40, char 1, byte offset 38: invalid UTF-8 code > > This is caused by the space before the punctuation, either we remove > it or we replace with a real space. Other problems are at lines 50 > (both spaces and «»), 73 (space) and 83 (spaces and «»).
I have no such probles with my file. The file is encoded in ISO-8859-1, not UTF-8. So you can't (and must not) check them with an UTF-8 checker. > > - nl.po: line 65, char 1, byte offset 25: invalid UTF-8 code > > Caused by the ï, easily replaceable. Same problem at line 104 (ë) and > 119 (ï again). > > However, this file contains a lot of comments, which seems uselessz: > should we remove them? > Ditto > - sv.po: line 33, char 1, byte offset 11: invalid UTF-8 code > > Caused by the ä, same at line 50-51 (ä again), 74 (å) and 84-85 (ä > again). > > Now, these three files contain a Content-Type declaration, specifying > their own charset. I'm not a debconf expert, but since UTF-8 is the > default since etch, shouldn't these files be encoded in UTF-8? Not necessarily. Even if files are ISO-encoded, there shouldn't be any problem
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature