On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:51:04AM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Daniel Burrows wrote: > > I don't know if this is ikiwiki's fault or the planet's fault. > > > > It's been pointed out to me that when I edit my blog posts, they > > appear again on planet.debian.org as if they were new. The creation > > date isn't changed: I use [[!meta date=...]] to set it manually, and I > > can see on the page and in both the RSS and the Atom feeds that it's > > correct. > > > > ikiwiki does include an <updated> tag in its Atom feed; I wonder if > > that could be confusing the planet? Is there any way to disable > > generation of this tag in the feed? > > Based on the atom spec, I think ikiwiki is using atom:updated correctly, > since it sets it to the mtime of the file. > > > The relevant field that planet should be looking at if it wants > a static publication date is atom:published. Ikiwiki sets that to the initial > page creation date, and never changes it. > > Here is an example from my latest blog entry, which I posted and then > edited. (But planet debian uses my rss feed, and seem to be happy with > what ikiwiki does there.)
Hm, maybe I should switch over to rss for the time being and see if that helps. Do you know offhand if the "planet" package is the same thing that's installed on planet.debian.org? If so, I can just reassign this over there. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
