Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> reopen 290242
> thanks
> 
> I'm reopening this bug because prozilla is still in woody, and Martin
> 'Joey' Schulze is preparing 3.0r6, which, from what he's told me, will
> still have prozilla in it. This should not happen. In my opinion,
> prozilla is either patched or removed.

For the record, removing a package with known security problems,
(and running wild exploits to use them) is not an option.

If the non-free code is patched out, fine with me, that would be
approved for the next stable update.  However, it would have to
be done fast since there can only be one update at all due to
the upcoming release of sarge.

Regards,

        Joey

-- 
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to