On Fri, 20 May 2005, sean finney wrote:
> hi peter,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:09:21PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > have a 'Maximum Value' of 100, which is not sufficient for SMP machines
> > where it can get as high as 100 x <number of CPUs>
> >
> > Please increase it to at least 400 (what I need :) or any other suitable
> > value.
>
> i believe you can up this number yourself by modifying the graph or
> graph template from within cacti (i had to do something similar for
> a dual proc machine as well as some gigabit interfaces).
I know that it's possible. I just figered that the default that comes
with cacti should be fixed.
> if that's not acceptable to you, this is a bug in net-snmp, not cacti.
> really, the snmpd *should* be responding with 1-100% values for each
> processor seperately...
>
> so, i'll leave it up to you whether to close this bug or retitle/reassign
> it to net-snmp.
I can see the point in reporting it the way that snmpd does.
If you don't want to change cacti's default then feel free to just close
the bug.
Cheers,
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
